Judicial Review Doesn’t Automatically Stay Removal
Judicial review doesn’t halt removal automatically; understand the role of PRRA and conditions for a stay of removal in immigration cases.
Judicial review doesn’t halt removal automatically; understand the role of PRRA and conditions for a stay of removal in immigration cases.
افزایش شانس موفقیت در دریافت ویزاهای توریستی، تحصیلی و کاری پس از ریجکتی: اولین ریجکتی ویزا میتواند ناامیدکننده باشد، اما وکیل دادگستری دکتر ثمین مرتضوی توصیه میکند که با طرح دعوا در دادگاه فدرال کانادا ظرف ۶۰ روز، میتوانید شانس خود را بهبود بخشید. این اقدام به متقاضیان فرصت میدهد تا دلایل ریجکتی را به چالش بکشند و مدارک جدید و معتبر ارائه دهند. برای آشنایی با مراحل و اهمیت این فرآیند و نقش حیاتی وکیل متخصص، این مطلب را بخوانید.
Introduction We often get inquiries from visa applicants who have faced the disappointment of a Canadian visa rejection. One of the common reasons quoted by visa officers is, “I am not satisfied that you will leave Canada at the end of your stay, as stipulated in subsection 216(1) of the Read more…
Introduction In a recent court decision, the Honourable Mr. Justice Ahmed granted the application for judicial review filed by Arezoo Dadras Nia, an Iranian citizen seeking a study permit in Canada. The court found that the visa officer’s decision to refuse the study permit application was unreasonable due to an Read more…
Background The court began by outlining the background of the case. Zeinab Yaghoobi Hasanalideh, an Iranian citizen, applied for a study permit in Canada. However, her application was refused by an immigration officer. The officer based the decision on the applicant’s ties in both Canada and Iran and the purpose Read more…
Introduction Welcome to the Pax Law Corporation blog! In this blog post, we will analyze a recent court decision that sheds light on the refusal of a Canadian study permit. Understanding the factors that contributed to the decision being deemed unreasonable can provide valuable insights into the immigration process. We Read more…