In British Columbia and across Canada, the protection of minors in the criminal justice system is a cornerstone of the legal framework. The Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJA) establishes principles and safeguards aimed at fostering rehabilitation and reintegration rather than punishment. A critical component of this protection is the restriction Read more…
The Federal Court’s recent decision in Theresa Radha Deochan v. The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration sheds light on the complexities of refugee protection and its cessation under Canadian law. This case, which revolves around the applicant’s repeated trips to her country of origin, emphasizes the critical importance of adhering Read more…
If you’ve received a negative decision from the Refugee Protection Division (RPD) of the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, it can be a disheartening experience. However, the Canadian legal system offers avenues for review and appeal. Here’s an overview of how each body assesses decisions, from the Refugee Appeal Read more…
Immigration judicial reviews are a vital legal mechanism for individuals seeking to challenge decisions made by immigration authorities in Canada. These reviews ensure that administrative decisions are made fairly, in accordance with the law, and with proper reasoning. Over the years, trends in immigration judicial reviews have highlighted shifts in Read more…
The Federal Court of Canada plays a crucial role in the country’s judicial system, but many people may not fully understand its purpose and functions. This guide aims to provide an accessible overview of the Federal Court, its jurisdiction, and how it differs from other courts in Canada. What Is Read more…
Temporary Resident Permits (TRPs) are a vital tool for individuals seeking entry to Canada despite being deemed inadmissible. TRPs allow individuals to visit, study, or work in Canada when their need to enter outweighs the risks of their inadmissibility. However, TRP applications are frequently refused due to several recurring issues. Read more…
If you’re experiencing significant delays in your immigration process in Canada, you may have heard about mandamus applications as a potential remedy. But how do you know if this legal avenue is right for your case? This blog will help you understand the key considerations to determine if you qualify Read more…
In Canadian administrative law, the concept of reasonableness is a cornerstone of judicial review. It sets the standard by which courts evaluate decisions made by administrative bodies, ensuring they are justifiable, transparent, and intelligible without replacing the decision-maker’s authority. What is Reasonableness? Reasonableness is a deferential standard of review applied Read more…
When applying for a judicial review against a decision made by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC), applicants may encounter a settlement offer presented by the Department of Justice (DOJ). A settlement offer is essentially a proposal from the DOJ to resolve the judicial review application without proceeding to a Read more…
The Federal Court of Canada plays a pivotal role in adjudicating legal disputes, including immigration matters, administrative decisions, and other judicial reviews. However, like many judicial systems around the world, the Federal Court observes a seasonal recess, which significantly impacts the timelines for ongoing cases and judicial reviews. Understanding the Read more…